Israel x Lebanon diplomatic meeting by...?

What you need to know

This market asks whether Israeli and Lebanese government representatives will sit down together — in person, deliberately, for real diplomacy — before the listed deadline. A Yes means an actual official meeting happened, where both sides came to talk about their relationship. A No means no such meeting took place by then. Crucially, the meeting doesn't have to be face-to-face between the two sides directly: if both governments send authorized people to meet through a shared intermediary in the same room, that counts too. The market settles Yes if a qualifying in-person diplomatic meeting happens before 11:59 PM ET on the listed date — confirmed by either government officially or by a consensus of credible news outlets. The bar is specific: it must be deliberate, authorized, and aimed at negotiation. A casual hallway greeting or a phone call does not count. Indirect meetings through a mediator do count, as long as both sides' representatives are physically present and authorized to negotiate. If nothing qualifying happens by the deadline, it resolves No. None of the provided news headlines relate directly to Israel-Lebanon diplomacy. There's no recent reporting here about talks, meetings, or breakthroughs between the two countries. The kind of news that would matter for this market would be announcements of planned negotiations, a ceasefire framework, or third-party mediation efforts bringing both sides together in person. The market is priced very high — around 95–98% — meaning participants strongly expect a meeting to happen. At that level, the main uncertainty isn't really 'will this happen or not'; it's the small but real chance that something unexpected derails it entirely. Israel and Lebanon have a deeply complicated history with no formal peace, so any diplomatic meeting is politically sensitive. A sudden escalation, a political collapse in either government, or a regional shock could prevent a meeting even when one seemed close.

The odds right now

• July 31+24.8 pts (1w)98%
• July 1695%
• July 17+76.1 pts (1w)94%
• July 1594%
• July 1479%
• July 131%

Price history

How this resolves

Resolves July 31, 2026

This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a diplomatic meeting between representatives of Israel and Lebanon by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A diplomatic meeting refers to a deliberate meeting between representatives of the listed countries who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to engage in negotiation or diplomacy regarding Israel-Lebanon relations on behalf of their governments. Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify. Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count. The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count. The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the Israel and Lebanon, and a consensus of credible reporting.

Related

Same markets. A fraction of the fee.

These apps all route to the same exchange order book. The difference is what each one adds on top of the exchange's own fee.

Published rates, checked July 2026. MetaMask charges a flat 4 percent per prediction trade. Jupiter adds a fee equal to the exchange's own taker fee at fill time, roughly 2 to 4 percent at typical odds. Where a market carries an exchange settlement fee, it applies everywhere, whichever app you use. Paridesk adds nothing on maker orders.

Trade this market on Paridesk: non-custodial, 0.5% fee.