US charges Hormuz fees by...?

What you need to know

This market asks whether the US government will actually collect money — or something of value — from ships or other parties in exchange for passing through or being protected in the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman where a huge share of the world's oil tankers travel. A Yes means the US has moved beyond just talking about it and has physically received at least one payment. A No means no such payment happened by the deadline, even if plans were announced. To resolve Yes, at least one real payment must actually be received by the US government — or someone collecting on its behalf — before the chosen deadline. An announcement, an executive order, or a new policy framework does not count on its own; money or goods must change hands. The payment can be cash, oil, cargo, or any agreed-in-kind transfer, from a shipping company, a vessel, or even a foreign government — as long as it flows under a US-imposed charge specifically tied to Hormuz transit or protection. No relevant news was provided for this market. The only headline supplied is about school fees in Punjab, which has no connection to the Strait of Hormuz. The kinds of developments worth watching for would be US government announcements about a Hormuz fee program, diplomatic reactions from oil-exporting nations, or any reported first payment under such a scheme. This is a genuinely close call — the market splits the probability fairly evenly across the three dates, with the December 2026 deadline carrying the most weight at 49%. The core tension is between how novel and politically explosive such a fee would be versus signals that the current US administration is open to unconventional revenue ideas. Even if a program is announced, the criteria require an actual payment, which adds another hurdle. Diplomatic blowback, legal challenges, or simple slow implementation could all delay or prevent collection.

The odds right now

• December 3135%
• August 3121%
• July 3114%
• July 176%

Price history

How this resolves

Resolves December 31, 2026

This market will resolve "Yes" if the United States government collects a payment from any shipping company, vessel, foreign government, or other relevant entity as a fee, toll, or reimbursement for transit through the Strait of Hormuz, or for the protection of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve "No". Any payment amount or rate will count. Payments may be monetary or in-kind (e.g., a share of cargo or oil) and may be collected directly by the US government or by an agent, contractor, or intermediary collecting on its behalf, provided the payment is made under a US-imposed fee or a compensation arrangement. The announcement, signing, or establishment of a fee program, executive order, regulation, or collection mechanism will not by itself qualify; at least one payment must actually be received by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Payments collected by Iran or any other party acting on its own behalf will not count. Payments under preexisting obligations, including US customs duties, tariffs on goods imported into the United States, or standard port charges, will not count unless newly imposed as a condition of Strait of Hormuz transit or protection. The resolution sources will be official announcements from the government of the United States and a consensus of credible reporting.

Related

Same markets. A fraction of the fee.

These apps all route to the same exchange order book. The difference is what each one adds on top of the exchange's own fee.

Published rates, checked July 2026. MetaMask charges a flat 4 percent per prediction trade. Jupiter adds a fee equal to the exchange's own taker fee at fill time, roughly 2 to 4 percent at typical odds. Where a market carries an exchange settlement fee, it applies everywhere, whichever app you use. Paridesk adds nothing on maker orders.

Trade this market on Paridesk: non-custodial, 0.5% fee.