← Markets
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild

US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild

Resolves Aug 31, 2026·$300.1k 24h vol·sports
$300.1k total volume

This market has resolved and is no longer trading.

OutcomeYesNo
Completed Match
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Set 1 Winner
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Set 2 Winner
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Set 2 O/U 8.5
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Match O/U 21.5
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Total Sets: O/U 2.5
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Set 1 O/U 8.5
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Set Handicap +/-1.5
US Open, Qualification ATP: Raul Brancaccio vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Match O/U 22.5

Resolution Criteria

This market refers to the tennis match between Raul Brancaccio and Thiago Seyboth Wild in the US Open, Qualification ATP, originally scheduled for August 24, 2026 at 3:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Raul Brancaccio' if Raul Brancaccio advances against Thiago Seyboth Wild. This market will resolve to 'Thiago Seyboth Wild' if Thiago Seyboth Wild advances against Raul Brancaccio. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 7, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.