Who will be in the Burnham cabinet?: how this market works
What you need to know
This market asks whether specific people will serve as full cabinet ministers if Andy Burnham becomes UK Prime Minister. Each person listed, Louise Haigh, Ed Miliband, and Lisa Nandy, has their own Yes or No question. A Yes means that person gets a proper cabinet seat in a Burnham government. A No means they are left out, given a lesser role, or Burnham never becomes Prime Minister at all. Think of it as predicting who sits around the cabinet table if Burnham ends up in Downing Street. Each market settles Yes only if two things happen: Burnham is appointed Prime Minister before December 31, 2026, and the listed person is formally appointed to a full cabinet position within seven days of that appointment. A few details matter here. The role must be a proper cabinet minister title, not just someone who attends cabinet meetings informally. If someone stays in an existing role without a new formal appointment, credible news reporting their continuation will count. If Burnham never becomes PM, everything resolves No automatically. The news from July 20, 2026 is directly relevant: it reports that Andy Burnham has taken power, and that David Lammy and Rachel Reeves were among the first senior ministers to leave. This tells us a cabinet reshuffle is actively underway right now. The high odds on Haigh, Miliband, and Nandy suggest the market believes all three are being brought in, but the exits of Lammy and Reeves show the new cabinet is still taking shape. The market prices all three names above 98%, so the main uncertainty is not really about balance between Yes and No. It is about whether something unexpected disrupts what looks like a near-certain outcome. Burnham has apparently just taken power, so the seven-day appointment window is the key risk. Could one of these individuals decline a role, be offered a non-cabinet position instead, or face a last-minute political complication? At this probability level, the market is essentially saying those scenarios are very unlikely, but not impossible.
The odds right now
- Wes Streeting+7.3 pts (1w)100%
- Lisa Nandy+1.7 pts (1w)100%
- Angela Rayner+1.8 pts (1w)100%
- Heidi Alexander+6.9 pts (1w)99%
- Jonathan Reynolds+12.1 pts (1w)99%
- Alan Campbell+49.1 pts (1w)99%
- Bridget Phillipson+39.5 pts (1w)93%
- Liz Kendall-11.5 pts (1w)30%
- Dan Jarvis-12.8 pts (1w)8%
- Catherine West-5.9 pts (1w)7%
- Jacqui Smith-23.4 pts (1w)4%
- James Murray-27.0 pts (1w)3%
Price history
Wes Streeting
How this resolves
Resolves December 31, 2026
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the listed individual is confirmed as a minister in the Cabinet of the United Kingdom formed as a result of Andy Burnham being appointed Prime Minister. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.” To qualify, the individual must be appointed or reappointed to a cabinet position by the United Kingdom Monarch in the period between the official appointment of Andy Burnham as Prime Minister of the UK and the seventh day thereafter, 11:59 PM UTC. Read the full resolution rules on the live market page.
Related
Other outcomes in this market
- Wes Streeting100%
- Lisa Nandy100%
- Angela Rayner100%
- Heidi Alexander99%
- Jonathan Reynolds99%
- Alan Campbell99%
- Bridget Phillipson93%
- Liz Kendall30%
- See all 23 outcomes →
More market guides
Same markets. A fraction of the fee.
These apps all route to the same exchange order book. The difference is what each one adds on top of the exchange's own fee.
Published rates, checked July 2026. MetaMask charges a flat 4 percent per prediction trade. Jupiter adds a fee equal to the exchange's own taker fee at fill time, roughly 2 to 4 percent at typical odds. Where a market carries an exchange settlement fee, it applies everywhere, whichever app you use. Paridesk adds nothing on maker orders.
Trade this market on Paridesk: non-custodial, 0.5% fee.
View & trade →